I don't understand all of what Bob is saying in this letter, but he raises issues that are important to all of us here in West Windsor.
If voter turnout is really only 26%, we have a weak democracy, and I support efforts to strengthen it, such as Bob's suggestion to make political literature available to the public and to conduct public forums to encourage discussion.
We have here in the West Windsor Voice a wonderful forum for raising political awareness, and I can't commend Stacy enough for starting it up from scratch and maintaining it at its current level. She saw the need and did something about it, and I can only imagine the time and effort it takes. Our hardcopy publication, The West Windsor & Plainsboro News sometimes helps discussion of local politics, especially around election times, but its main shortcoming is that it doesn't have a Letters to the Editor section. It would be helpful if this publication incorporated some of the methods used by its previous owner and by Princeton's Town Topics. Finally, the West Windsor Facebook page can also be an effective forum - if it's used.
I'm not sure what Bob is saying about "party transparency." I believe his meaning of "transparency" is that which occurs when political candidates explain their views, intentions, and promises fully and honestly to the public and that they do not reneg on those promises. I don't know why he uses the word "party" as an adjective to this term. Is he saying that with a political party system, we will have more transparency? If so, it would be nice of him to explain why he believes that. I don't see an overwhelming argument for it and do see good arguments against it.
The best way to ensure transparency in government is with a non-apathetic, politically-active citizenry who publicly engage with candidates via all available tools, such as those mentioned above. With the democratic foundation we have, albeit weak, and whether party based or not, the citizenry will bring us the government we deserve.